Newsletter sign-up

-
-
Recent Posts
- Lawrence Solomon: Tiny’s big spending problem is writ large across the country
- During COVID, the charter has been useless
- Rise Up: Freedom must prevail!
- Lawrence Solomon: Amazon doesn’t compete in the free market. It should have to.
- Lawrence Solomon: Cyclists are just bloody collateral damage in the climate change wars
Category Archives: Energy
Unconventional wisdom
(May 21, 2008) The Deniers received special mention on the “Political Grapevine” segment of “Special Report with Brit Hume”: A man described as an anti-nuclear, 1970s peace activist who opposes subsidies to the oil industry has written a book challenging conventional wisdom about global warming. Lawrence Solomon lays out arguments on both sides — including information that often goes unreported in the mainstream media. Continue reading
Posted in Energy
Leave a comment
Carbo-charged nuclear
(May 21, 2008) Nuclear power has been an economic failure, despite being larded with subsidies and shorn of liabilities that face its competitors. Oil price hikes have not made it economic, either. Continue reading
Posted in Energy
Leave a comment
The limits to nuclear: McCain shouldn’t try to follow French disaster
(May 13, 2008) “If France can produce 80% of its electricity with nuclear power, why can’t we?” asks U.S. presidential candidate John McCain. Nuclear power is a cornerstone of Senator McCain’s plan to combat climate change, which he is unveiling this week. Continue reading
Posted in Energy
Leave a comment
Ontario’s Energy Crunch
(April 2, 2008) Good morning. I have some good news for you this morning. The good news is that Ontario has an easy and painless way out of the energy fix that we’re in. I have some bad news for you, too. Our government doesn’t know it, and, I am certain, neither do most of you in this room. Because of what you don’t know, we face a future in which we all may freeze in the dark. Continue reading
Posted in Energy
Leave a comment
Apocalypse now?
(March 29, 2008) To most of us, the consequences of a meltdown or some other catastrophic accident at a nuclear reactor are unimaginable. To the companies in the worldwide nuclear industry, and to insurance companies, the consequences are all too imaginable – they would be wiped out if held responsible for a malfunction that caused hundreds of billions of dollars in damage. Because reactors were not a commercial proposition, decades ago, the corporate world refused to back nuclear power. Continue reading
Posted in Energy
Leave a comment