Author Archives: Other News Sources

Don’t give me ‘absolutely safe’

(November 18, 2002) I have to agree with Lawrence Solomon (Relatively Safe; Absolutely Ridiculous, Nov. 13). I’m a (PhD!) professional geologist who spent many years wandering around rock formations in Saskatchewan which host uranium ore, many so radioactive to our handheld Geiger counters (scintillometers, to be technically precise) they went offscale. Back in the 1980s I was at a nuclear conference in Calgary where one of Mr. Solomon’s government experts was talking about how safe mining was and the excellent federal government safety controls. Continue reading

Posted in Energy | Leave a comment

Absolutely ridiculous

(November 13, 2002) “The nuclear industry has never claimed to be ‘absolutely safe’,” says AECL PhD Jeremy Whitlock. Never? I guess no one could be that dumb, certainly no one in the worldwide nuclear industry that I wrote about last week. Continue reading

Posted in Energy | Leave a comment

Re: Less Government, Less Greenhouse Gas

(November 11, 2002) Mr. Solomon points out that Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions contributed by the agriculture sector is about 10%. What he neglects to indicate is that, in fact, the agriculture sector will address 20% of Canada’s target emissions now that agricultural soils are recognized as carbon sinks. Continue reading

Posted in Agriculture (Rural) | Leave a comment

Nuclear risk: Make ’em pay

(November 6, 2002) Nuclear power is absolutely safe, the nuclear industry is fond of saying. Only scaremongers, the ignorant and fools think otherwise, it maintains. Canadian governments have fallen for the nuclear industry’s assurances but, thankfully, Canada’s private sector lenders haven’t. Knowing that the risk of nuclear contamination is real, and that they could be on the financial hook in the event of radioactive contamination, banks and other private financiers have refused to back nuclear facilities. Continue reading

Posted in Energy | Leave a comment

Less government, less greenhouse gas

(October 24, 2002) Contrary to the naysayers who claim Western countries would face economic ruin in meeting Kyoto’s greenhouse gas targets, three winning models are proven to exist and proven to yield spectacular results. The first model – the USSR approach – involves privatizing an entire economy. Russia became the world’s greatest greenhouse gas reducer by abandoning its centrally planned economy. Continue reading

Posted in Energy | Leave a comment